Services for High Net Worth Investors and Family Offices

Case Study B Longstanding Brokerage Links

Situation

  • A family office came to Manager Analysis via a referral from a Family Office that we assist. The family leader had managed wealth carefully, and he benefited from the stock market’s long-term performance. However, because he had kept portfolio management considerations away from his children, and because the entire family wanted to plan for an orderly transition of responsibilities, the family asked Manager Analysis to review the family’s portfolios and identify any material threats to the assets.
  • The next generation was generally pleased with their current holdings, comprised primarily of liquid, larger cap equities, and muni bonds, and they did not want to alter the strategy. They also valued their operationally conservative profile and comparably simple legal structures. Virtually all of the assets were held directly and so the family was in a good position to control the timing of transactions to avoid unnecessary capital gains taxes.

Findings

  • The broker was attempting to gain discretionary control of the family’s portfolio through sleight of hand.
  • Buried within a simple “principal transactions agreement” was a commitment for the family to a second agreement, granting the broker full discretion. The family did not to sign the form because of our strongly delivered advice.
  • While portfolio turnover was low, the broker was charging commissions of 1% to 2% on large stock trades. He was seeking the opportunity to liquidate the entire estate’s liquid holdings to receive a $1 million commission. Comparable commissions would be about $125,000.
  • We also conducted reputational reference checks on the broker and found that he had been placing clients into the highest commission investment products permitted by his brokerage firm.

Resolution

  • We assisted the family in establishing accounts at other brokerage firms, who charge zero or near-zero commissions on equity trades, and we are currently in the process of moving their holdings.

Want to learn more? Please contact Chris Cutler, Tom Donahoe or Safia Mehta at 917 287 9551.

© 2019 MAS, LLC

Considering an OCIO (Outsourced CIO) search? You should lead with an RFI as a critical first step…

Its purpose is to have your most critical questions addressed upfront and quickly. You can then do a “deep dive” via RFP to those providers most aligned with your needs and your mission.

Difference between an RFI (RFI = Request for Information) and a RFP (Request for Proposal)?

Your RFI is composed of your own brief set of questions. The answers you obtain will enable you to filter the available provider set. You can then focus on those firms who can add the most value for you and your organization.

The advantages for you using an RFI :

  1. TIME SAVING – Your time is valuable and an RFI is the best use of your scarce time.
  2. REVIEW A LARGER POTENTIAL UNIVERSE OF PROVIDERS – Enables you to “ping” a broader range of potential providers so that the filtered group will be the most relevant of possible OCIO providers.
  3. CLARIFIES YOUR GOALS – As you compose the 5 to 8 questions, you focus on what your key concerns or needs are. This provide the opportunity for the Investment Committee to memorialize its specific goals. This will also help align the staff’s efforts.
  4. IDENTIFIES CONFLICTS OR HIDDEN ISSUES – An RFI surfaces issues early in the process so that you, and potential providers, don’t waste efforts or incur disappointments.
  5. FAIRNESS – Each bespoke RFP requires 60 – 80 hours of preparation. By contrast, an RFI should require no more than 3-4 hours of dedicated focus by each provider. The answers are best discussed via a conference call. A call could well elicit candid responses and be a “dry run” for how you might interact with each provider’s team.

Two Sample Questions for a RFI (typically one would have 5 – 8 questions):

  1. What are the key distinguishing features of your investment process that sets you apart?
  2. Are investment offerings done in form of comingled accounts, SMA’s. or other structures? What are the liquidity provisions of lock-ups/redemptions especially as they relate to Alternatives?

Want to learn more? Please contact Chris Cutler or Tom Donahoe.

How an OCIO Might Evaluate Your Existing Portfolio

Please find enclosed a sampling of two different approaches (among others) current in the market.

One OCIO may separate the evaluation between its Investment team and its Risk team. They “snapshot” your current portfolio composition and compare it to their own proprietary allocation.

  1. DOCUMENT REVIEW – There is a review of your Investment Policy Statement (Objective(s), Goals, Asset Allocation Targets, etc.)
  2. CURRENT HOLDINGS PROJECTED BACKWARDS – They “snapshot” the current holdings and model them back for 3 years and create a 1-year and 3-year performance profile.
  3. EQUITY COMPOSITION – They back-test to relevant industry benchmarks: geography and sector, market cap, style. In other words, they evaluate through the lens of key factor analysis.
  4. RETURNS v. FACTORS – They evaluate the passive and active portions compared to reference indices and determine what is the percentage of active share management (i.e. the profile that veers from being purely passive or “index hugging.”) They measure returns, R2 , alpha measurements, and beta values.
  5. RISK PERFORMANCE – The risk team focuses on the volatility measures and tries to determine the potential drawdown risk. They also try to determine whether the portfolio is currently built for through-a-full-economic-cycle holding period.
  6. FIXED INCOME ANALYSIS – Fixed income is compared to relevant FI benchmarks, e.g. Barclays Global Aggregate. They also measure the US Treasury composition, corporate debt, other categories, as well as the maturity buckets, interest rate duration, and credit rating duration.
  7. SUMMARY OF OBSERVATIONS – They then provide a summary of observations.
  8. RECOMMENDED ACTIONS – Are informed by a thorough 4 to 5-page analysis.

Another OCIO might perform an evaluation as follows:

  1. HOLDINGS PROJECTED BACKWARDS – They create a look-alike portfolio of your actual holdings. They assume monthly rebalancing and do a 30-year lookback, showing semiannual returns. They benchmark to a balanced long-term portfolio, a) US equity bias and 2) ACWI focused. They track return performance over time against purchasing power goals.
  2. INCREMENTAL RISK v. VOLATILITY OF RETURNS – This is a graphic representation of a NACUBO-cohort median portfolio adjusted for your organization’s size as well as a cohort of the OCIO’s own clients, also adjusted for size.
  3. TABLE OF ASSET CLASS ALLOCATION – They provide an asset class allocation grid which identifies 3 main categories (with sub-categories):
    • (a) Global Equity (US/Intl-EM), Alternatives (PE/HF/Comm./RE) and Fixed Income (Core/Opportunistic/TIPS/Cash.) They provide 4 additional columns;
    • (b) Policy Goal percentages by both categories and sub-categories), Min-Max range per the 3 major categories of assets,
    • (c) detailed Active Target (current),
    • (d) your own organization’s current allocations, and
    • (e) planned goals to reach over the next 6 mos. to 12 mos. Horizon. They are especially mindful of harvesting the illiquidity of alts as well as the volatility dampening nature of hedge fund holdings for a through the cycle resiliency of the portfolio.
  4. RISK ANALYSIS – They perform a thorough returns-based style analysis as well as a holdingsbased style analysis. They are especially mindful that using multiple managers sometimes obscures the combined risks if the portfolio information is not timely, consistent, and properly aggregated.
  5. “ACTIVE RISK” ANALYSIS – This is the risk segment of an investment portfolio that results due to active management decisions made by portfolio managers. This measure will also capture the impact of “market timing” decisions made by the managers. So, the active risk is the annualized standard deviation of the monthly difference between the portfolio return and the benchmark return. Active risk is typically a long-only measure.
  6. DETAILED ANALYSIS of the drivers of specific risk. This is often stock specific risk and could be related to stock size, especially if you have a small cap manger in your stable of managers.
  7. STYLE MAPPING OVER TIME – This provides insight into how a manager may be adjusting its factors over time and perhaps moving from growth to value, etc. as market condition require. Classification of portfolios by size, value, growth orientation, etc.
  8. SUMMARY – A final two paragraphs on the importance of evaluating both the risk and fee budgets on active managers, most specifically on those managers who have demonstrated adding value through their security selection.

Personally, we find the second approach provides a more robust analysis. It covers full, multiple economic cycle time horizons and includes a realistic rebalancing impact. Moreover, the same team performs the investment and risk analysis and so there is no “handoff” between internal teams that could create gaps in the analysis.

Want to learn more? Please contact Chris Cutler or Tom Donahoe.

Achieve Success by Splitting Your Portfolio between You and an OCIO

This approach is inspired by the successful path taken by a large US cancer research foundation.

The Foundation Board wanted to retain direct control over a $75 mm liquidity portfolio and focus OCIO talent on their $200 mm perpetual portfolio. They needed $40 mm for 3 years’ worth of grant making and $35 mm to retain the ability to immediately finance any cancer therapy that suddenly proved promising. They wanted professional managers to focus on the perpetual portfolio. By splitting the total AUM, the Board achieved the best average fee levels between the two pools.

You could achieve the same type of benefits, as outlined below.

Liquidity Pool (typically 20% of AUM to cover 3 years’ worth of grants/expenses)

The composition would likely be mostly cash/fixed income/ETF’s. In the event of an extended equity market downturn, you are not forced to sell a large percentage of depreciated equities. The Investment Committee would directly manage/rebalance this pool and fees would be the lowest possible.

Perpetual Pool (80% of AUM)

This long-term portfolio would have minimal liquidity restraints. The OCIO could manage this pool to specific long-term goals. The ability to harvest an “illiquidity premium” often present in Alternative Assets is increased. The OCIO can focus on obtaining the best risk-adjusted long-term returns for you. This enables a more “resilient portfolio” that will protect through a full equity market cycle.

Other Advantages for You

LIQUIDITY POOL CONTROL for the Investment Committee. They become fully attuned to the
Liquidity/Spending/Expense nexus.

SHIFTS FOCUS TO STRATEGIC ISSUES – Anecdotally post-OCIO decision, the Committee focuses on the bigger picture and longer-term trends. There is often less friction over tactical decisions that are taken.

OCIO TYPICALLY WOULD PROVIDE ANALYTICS FOR BOTH POOLS – OCIO could capture Liquidity Pool positions in a holistic analysis that informs the Committee of the entire investment picture of the combined holdings of the two pools.

FEES on the Liquidity Pool will be the lowest obtainable and will bring down your overall fee spend.

BORROWING – For additional flexibility, you can set up a securities lending program, using either or both of the pools. This offers greater flexibility to “ride out” a sustained equity market sell-off. There are operational preparation steps but no fees incurred unless you use the secured credit, unlike the facility fees incurred for a line of credit.

Want to learn more? Please contact Chris Cutler or Tom Donahoe.

Univ. of Calif Embraces Performance Fees, Whittles Manager List

By Aziza Kasumov September 30, 2019

“The measures taken by UC have dropped the bill for investment management expenses by $1 billion over a five-year period, according to board materials. But with management fees having dipped across the industry, $1 billion in savings for a portfolio the size of UC’s isn’t necessarily “in excess of what others have achieved,” says Chris Cutler, founder of Manager Analysis Services.

The school’s consolidation among public strategies is also not uncommon, Cutler also says. “I’ve seen a substantial reduction in alpha across many strategies, and that tends to lead to allocators consolidating to managers that they think are best,” he adds.

Largest One Month S&P Declines and Subsequent 1Y, 3Y, and 5Y Returns

Given the magnitude of the S&P Sell-off in December 2018 (-9.03 %), we thought it would be instructive to examine past events of a similar magnitude. We selected all single month sell-offs since January 1950. Here is a table and graph of our findings.

No one can predict what the future holds but certainly as one wag put it, “we’ve been to this picture show before.” Large drops in equity prices over a one month horizon are a temptation to take drastic action. Investors tend to become emotionally involved with the market and it is difficult to remain disciplined. What is critical is that investors build portfolios that are resilient to market corrections and achieve the best long-term risk adjusted returns. We present the historical data for the reader’s own interpretation.

Want to learn more? Please contact Chris Cutler, Tom Donahoe, or Safia Mehta at 917 287 9551.

Avoiding High Costs of Transitioning Assets to a new OCIO

A major utility company’s service promise is “We’re on it!” A new OCIO will say the same thing. In fact,
most OCIO’s have dedicated teams that arrange new client onboarding. From personal experience, the
process is problematic, and the transition tends to leave client’s money on the table. This could easily
cost the Foundation up to 1% or more in value of its corpus.

Here’s why – Once a client gives “walking papers” to the existing OCIO, it is essentially “pencils down.”
Cooperation often tends to decline; it’s just human nature. Likewise, a new OCIO may assert that they
do not own the performance until the assets hit the new custodian’s books at the new OCIO. This
potential material gap in performance is owned by the client. Here are typical stages in a transition and
miscommunication often leads to process delays.

Manager Analysis Services can help you avoid those costs by acting both as your search consultant
and as your transition consultant.

Documents Needed by New OCIO Team (partial listing)

-Articles of Incorporation, EIN Document, IRS Letter of Determination
-Bylaws, List of signatories, etc.
-Existing Investment Policy Statement and Asset Range Grid (both subject to editing by new OCIO)
-Board resolution confirming appointment of the new OCIO

Critical Handling of Your Assets

Which assets will be sold, when and how, and how will proceeds be transferred?
Which assets can be transferred electronically? (ACAT)
Which assets will follow over time? Proper timing sequence.
Transition Allocation: Will proceeds and assets be transferred over “as is” to the new OCIO? Will
there be a reallocation by asset class amidst the asset transfer process?

Special Instructions

Who are authorized signatories to transfer of proceeds or assets from old OCIO with new (i.e. nonstandard) wire instructions that the custodian will need to verbally confirm via call backs?
Depending on the sequence and settlement dates, will the Foundation be out of the market (wholly or
partially) for 1 or more days? Will the new allocation occur over time or be “averaged” into the market,
or fully deployed ASAP? (You should insist on a detailed transition plan and probe for gaps/errors.)

Reconciliation of all Transactions in Anticipation of EOY Audit Review

If you do not take steps to have all the transfers and liquidations, etc. reconciled within a few weeks
following the transfers, you are inviting future headaches, costly reconstruction of data, etc. Auditors
have a laser-like focus on these large transactions, given the absolute size relative to total assets, as well
as margin for significant error and losses.

Want to learn more? Please contact Chris Cutler, Tom Donahoe or Safia Mehta at 917 287 9551

Outsourced CIO or Not? How an IC Might Approach the Decision

Let’s explore how an Investment Committee may approach the decision in an organized process:

a) Your Range of Available Alternatives
b) Key questions to Consider
c) Obtaining Buy-in from Your Fellow Committee Members
d) Educating Yourself on the Advantages/Drawbacks
e) Ensuring a Focused Comparison of Providers
a) Your Range of Available Alternatives

The typical continuum of Investment Management approaches are as follows:

Certainly, there are variations of the above four approaches including a hybrid of approaches.
While each approach has the potential to succeed, there are approaches that contain inherent
structural and behavioral flaws which may impede success. (One could also split the portfolio
corpus between internal CIO and outsourced CIO management.)

In an AGB publications1, they “strongly advise against…the investment committee [that]
functions as CIO, often with the help of a consultant…we now have decades of strong evidence
that Investment Committees simply have found it difficult to succeed in this role2 .”
If we accept the results of the AGB research, then we are left to focus on Internal CIO, IC Chair
as CIO, and Outsourced CIO. Internal CIO (and staff) introduces the issues of cost, economies
of scale, and compensation/personnel issues. IC Chair as CIO concentrates power and discretion
in a single person, who is a volunteer. It may work if the person has the required expertise,
leadership experience, and the time to focus. Let’s now turn attention to the focus of this
briefing, how to consider an Outsourced CIO.

b) Key Questions to Consider

Let’s consider whether an Outsourced CIO may be appropriate for your organization. Before
considering the merits, some threshold questions are appropriate:

  1. A non-profit typically retains outside legal counsel, external auditor, IT expertise, payroll management, grant tracking, etc. (all non-core activities) where external expertise is needed and a recognized value-add. Do members of the IC view an Outsourced OCIO as a value-add and are they willing to give up day-to-day investment control and shift their focus to oversight and more strategic issues?
  2. If the Board is open to an Outside CIO, what are the existing and future challenges/issues that the committee is trying to address?
  3. What are the range and type of desired investment offerings that need to be provided by the Outside CIO?
  4. How should the Committee members educate themselves as to what’s available, what’s appropriate for their organization and how can they effectively and efficiently internalize the information to arrive at the best outcomes for their organization.

(Certainly, there are more detailed and other helpful questions that will assist a committee
in its analysis, but we shall consider only those above for purposes of our review here.)

c) Obtaining Buy-in from Your Fellow Committee Members

Research has shown that non-profits, with rare exceptions have simply not maintained the
purchasing power of their Investment Portfolios, especially relative to the pre-GFC (2007)
levels.3 In order to conduct an effective Outsourced CIO search, the IC members must first agree
that there is a challenge to be addressed. If there is disagreement on the IC as to which of the
four main approaches presented are appropriate, the search process may be fatally flawed and
simply not lead to the best outcome. It may well further divide the IC if the differences of
opinion are not subject to suasion or authentic consensus.

If authentic agreement can be reached to move forward, then the IC should be specific and agree
in writing, on the precise parameters of who should have what investment management
responsibilities and the proper assignment of oversight duties.

The IC should agree on what gaps or deficiencies are to be addressed. They should review their
existing IPS and see if it really addresses how they would like the portfolio to be managed on a
go forward basis. This is the time to identify asset classes, investment structures (e.g. comingled
accounts v. SMA’s) that the IC wishes to embrace or avoid. If there is a desire to focus more on
impact investing or ESG, this is the time to identify that as an item of inclusion, as well.

d) Educating Yourself and IC on Advantages/Drawbacks of an Outsourced CIO

An Outsourced OCIO is no panacea but a means to an end. Given the customized demands of
individual non-profits, you need to understand what your wants are and what is available or
customizable in the market. There is abundant information available on provider websites and
some can be quite useful, and while much may not be directly on point for your needs. You
could invite a sample of providers to address your IC at periodic meetings and gradually obtain
key points of information, but the information may be skewed or incomplete.

In the alternative, it may be more cost effective and time efficient to hire a search consultant who
can match your specific needs to what the outsourced CIO providers offer and what could be
created for you. Be mindful that there are 80+ OCIO providers who assert national coverage and
yet they have quite different investment approaches, investment vehicles, asset class coverages,
reporting capabilities, fee structures, gradations of outsourcing services provided, etc.

You also need to achieve a “good fit” with your ultimate provider. This will maximize your
chances of forming a long and worthwhile partnership with your provider. A search provider can
provide a team who gets to know you and can partner with you to achieve your specific goals.
The team will be your strongest advocate throughout the search and the on-boarding process.

e) Ensuring a Focused Comparison of Providers

Although the industry has grown to $1.1Trln4 over the last 20 years, it suffers from a lack of standardization in reporting returns and some opaqueness as to total fees charged. There are a variety of OCIO firms each with their own areas of strength. The lineup of providers includes a) the largest OCIOs with +$90 Bn in AUM, b) medium-sized OCIOs who are considered the $15 – $30 Bn range, c) niche OCIOs who have a specific investment strategy focus, and 4) alternatives-focused OCIOs. If the Committee does not have a consensus view as to the type of OCIO they would like to work with, seeing a variety of OCIO models and reviewing the services obtainable from each would help the IC arrive at a more informed decision.

An additional caution is that once an Outsourced CIO is chosen, then portfolio assets will likely
need to be liquidated and/or transferred to new custodians. There are risks involved with this
timing and asset transfer. It should be planned in specific detail to ensure that there is no market
timing or excess bid/offer spreads incurred. Without enough planning and oversight, losing 30 –
80 bp’s on the portion of the portfolio liquidated can occur. There could also be legacy assets.

Summary

In summary, the goal is to ensure the IC fully describes what its needs are and what level of
discretion suits its members. If there is not agreement by the IC members PRIOR to the actual
search, it will be likely be more difficult to achieve the best outcome possible for a non-profit
organization. There are a broad variety of providers whose specific expertise and structure
enables them to provide solutions best suited to some types of clients rather than others.

Want to learn more? Please contact Chris Cutler, Tom Donahoe or Safia Mehta at 917 287 9551.

1 Association of Governing Bodies of Universities and Colleges, “Endowment Management for Higher Education”, 2017, AGB Press, Washington, D.C.

2 They cite 4 impediments: Lack of expertise, difficulty in making timely decisions, inability to make difficult, contrarian decisions, and diffusion of responsibility., ibid., p.25

3 Sandeep Dahiya, David Yermack. “Investment Returns and Distribution Policies of Non-Profit Endowment Funds.” Report 11/27/2018 Available on https://papers.ssrn.com

4 Cerulli Associates/Blackrock, “OCIO at an Inflection Point”, P. 3, Report 2019 © 2019 MAS, LLC

Foundations And Endowments Find Help For Navigating Complex Outsourced CIO Market

By Colin Rajala I September 5, 2019

Mark Titzer joined Dominican University as its VP for Finance in May, 2017, with an extensive to-do list from financial strategy and budgeting, to rebidding all of its contracts and services. As more pressing day-to-day tasks and operational matters came across his desk, the task of rebidding contracts seemed to be falling down the pecking order like the stock market after an interest rate hike.

Titzer’s staff of six had just as much on their plate, and the task of rebidding its outsourced CIO contract seemed years away, especially with the increased sophistication of investment portfolios and the complexity of outsourced CIOs and their various institutional models.

Those barriers led Titzer to contract a search consultant to help navigate the outsourced CIO rebidding initiative of reviewing and evaluating the options available, for a firm to manage its approximately $35 million endowment.

‘We didn’t have the expertise or the time to do justice to the process,” he said. “We knew we weren’t going to be able to ask all the right questions and do a proper comparative analysis … It was a no brainer to work with a search con­sultant for the due diligence and independent review process.” Titzer and his team are not alone, and with the outsourced CIO industry expected to grow by 10.7% among nonprofits between 2018 and 2023, according to a report from Cerulli Associates on behalf of BlackRock, more foundations and endowments are likely to turn to search consultants to assist with navigating what can be a difficult evaluation and search process, according to investors.

“I think the prominence of outsourced CIO search providers coincided with the growth of outsourced CIOs in the last six to seven years,” said Frank Wilkinson, managing director of North American Marketing at outsourced CIO, SEI Investments. “Then there were probably in the realm of 50 or so companies listing themselves as OCIOs, and that has jumped to more than 80 currently. In the end, it is up to the institutional client to explore their options, but that has become more and more difficult with so many variables and options available to them, so they have increasingly looked to outside help to assist in the processes.”

Outsourced CIO options can range from large multifaceted financial institutions with an investment function, to large investment consulting practices with an outsourced arm, to smaller boutique investment firms, and determining which model is the best fit for institutions is a key reason for the increased usage of search consultants.

lnHub, which provides an on line RFP technology, has found that greater than 60% of discretionary endowment and foundation RFPs on its platform have a search consultant running the process, as opposed to the less than 20% that use a search provider when seeking traditional consulting services, according to Ariana Amplo, Founder and CEO of lnHub.

Beyond the variety of options and mod­els for nonprofits to understand and tra­verse, the lack of resources, smaller staffs and infrequent board and committee meetings has also pushed some to utilize the search providers.

”They just can’t do it themselves, they just don’t have the bandwidth,” said Tom Donahoe, Managing Director of Outsourced CIO Search and Governance at Manager Analysis Services. ”There are many talented people on the committees and boards, but you only have a certain amount of a governance budget, or the time and focus to fulfill your fiduciary duty. If the committee members quit their day jobs, they would certainly be able to undertake a full-blown search by themselves. What they realize is that they can’t quit their day jobs, they only meet about four times a year and they really can’t respond as nimbly as a fiduciary as they would like.”

Connecting With Search Providers

Foundation and endowment forays into the outsourced CIO space have been most prevalent among institutions below $500 million in assets, according to investors and allocators.

The average asset size of an endowment and foundation conducting a discretionary manager search on lnHub’s platform was just $52 million in 2019 compared to approximately $137 million in 2018, according to Amplo.

“As more smaller endowments and foundations adapt RFPs, there are more opportunities for managers to bid in a formal process for these. It is not only a process reserved for large accounts anymore,” she said.

Investment advisor North Pier Search Consulting has worked with orga­nizations with roughly $25 million in assets, but finds its sweet spot to be those with assets of $75 million to up to the high hundreds of millions, said Managing Partner, Founder and CIO James Scheinberg.

“We are focused on the small- and mid-sized organizations, frankly the organizations that originally would not have the ability to use the firms that charge more to do large OCIO searches,” said Larry Coats, Jr., President and CEO of Clearview Fiduciary Alliance, a membership-based service that facilitates the sharing and reporting of nonprofits’ investment advisor and consultant results to help the institutions understand and analyze their investment programs. The alliance currently consists of 41 member organi­zations totaling $1.2 billion in long-term assets with the members ranging in size from $1 million to $245 million in assets, according to Coats.

He noted that the organization only does searches for nonprofits that agree to be members of the organization, saying, “We want to see that they are committed not only to a project to find hopefully a good or better advisor than what they have now, but we want to make sure they are doing that in the context of making a long-term commitment to be better fiduciaries and be better informed fiduciaries.”

While smaller organizations appear to be the most prevalent user of the search provider resources, how the institutions connect with the providers is often by chance or through their small networks, according to investors and allocators.

“When you are doing a search for an OCIO search provider, having to search for an OCIO search firm is adding another level of complexity to the process and it doesn’t really happen too often,” said Chris Cutler, founder and manager of diligence and outsourced cio search at Manager Analysis Services. “What we are seeing, and we don’t think this is efficient, is that people are approaching outsourced CIO search providers because they are associated with a large brand or because of a personal relationship a board member already has with an outsourced CIO search firm.”

Dominican University’s Titzer was not aware of what firms might be able to help with a search as he was looking to rebid its contracts. He was for­tunate to come into a situation where the institution was working with an advisory firm, Plan PILOT, that was providing fiduciary advisory services for the university’s 403(b) retirement plan.

The finance team was going through a set of quarterly training sessions with Plan PILOT’s fiduciary team to make sure the team was meeting its responsibilities before he asked if they could, or knew anyone that could, help with an advisory search for its endowment.

“It was an off-handed ask if they do that type of work. It wasn’t something we went after immediately,” Titzer said, noting that Plan PILOT Managing Director Mark Olsen and Senior Consultant Frank Szymanek were thorough in their process and able to ask all of the right questions to align staff, trustees and its outsourced CIO.

For institutions that are looking for search consultants or outsourced CIO providers outside of their networks, a good place to start is attending industry events and conferences, according to CFO Jack Willoughby at the First Community Foundation Partnership of Pennsylvania. He noted that the foundation did not utilize a search consultant as part of its rebid process in 2017 /2018 as he compiled a list of outsourced CIOs years in ad­vance of the search by fielding calls from any and all providers to become familiar with the services and models available.

Through his own research, he knew the various outsourced CIO market seg­ments and his organization’s need for a firm with a strong research team. Willoughby asserts that nonprofits that are not familiar with the discretion­ary manager space should not be hesitant to identify an unbiased opinion to corroborate their own conclusions.

That sentiment was echoed by CIO Bruce Guiot of the Miami University Foundation (Ohio), which tapped Botanica Capital Partners to help con­duct an invitation-only search for an outsourced CIO that wrapped up last year.

“Most folks by then had heard of the OCIO model, but did not fully under­stand what it means or certainly the ways it gets delivered,” he said. “We needed someone to educate the board impartially … The consultant was initially brought on to evaluate the ‘buy versus build decision.”‘

Connecting with search providers is not reserved solely for institutions, as outsourced CIOs should also be net­working with the search consultants to ensure they are aware of the discre­tionary firms’ management team, processes and philosophies.

“As we have grown the business and expanded, we have broadened our sights of the [search] consultant market,” said Matthew Wright, President and CIO of outsourced CIO Disciplina Group. “We brought on [Managing Director] Brian Arsenault to help those efforts and look at search consul­tants to understand who is in the marketplace and expand our reach to meet with them. Four or five years ago it was not something we focused on. Back then, opportunities surfaced from a committee or staff member who was going to lead the change and we would try and meet them or have someone set up an introduction.”

SEl’s Wilkinson noted that the outsourced CIO firm has historically had resources dedicated to lead generation outside of traditional direct chan­nels, such as referral opportunities, and it has been a natural evolution for them to focus on search consultants.

“We have a dedicated practice within our institutional group committed to serve as intermediaries between SEI and the search providers,” he said. “They are independent of direct sales responsibilities and can focus on helping build relationships with search consultants. It was driven by the need to build relationships and drive education on who we are and what we provide.”

As institutions and outsourced CIOs look to build connections with the search providers to help them navigate their search initiatives, the search consultants can distinguish themselves from peers through their own connections to the outsourced CIOs and qualitative information about the firms, according to Donahoe.

“When people do an outsourced CIO search, they don’t know the backstory for any number of the organizations,” he said. “We differentiate ourselves in our intimate knowledge of these firms. Who is in the driver’s seat? How long are they going to be there? What changes at the firm have occurred and what are their motivations? We incorporate these insights in our workings with the board so that they better understand what each firm has to offer and to enable their decisions to be fully informed.”

Search Consultant Processes

Many nonprofits, particularly on the smaller side, are board-driven or have a staff that is more administrative than investment-focused, which often means they do not have the requisite skills when it comes time to select an outsourced CIO or evaluate performance, according to investors and allocators.

“These organizations are only sitting from their vantage point. They don’t see the field like we do,” North Pier’s Scheinberg said.

Nonprofits have historically struggled with investment advisor RFPs be­cause of the lack of requisite skills, according to ClearView’s Coats.

“They didn’t have a process, it wasn’t logically established,” Coats said. “They would call another organization that did an RFP in the last five years and say, ‘would you give me a copy of what you send?”‘

The inability and difficulties surrounding organizing and executing suc­cessful RFP processes has provided an opportunity for search consultants to show their value to institutional investors. Scheinberg finds that con­structing an RFP, providing answers from respondents and constructing a scoring grid is “a baseline service that everyone should be doing.”

“Having institutional quality oversight over the selection and monitoring of an OCIO provider is critical to meeting the institution’s financial goals and their fiduciary responsibilities. Retaining a search consultant, perform­ing a thorough RFP, and utilizing automated solutions, are part and parcel of an effective governance process,” said Plan PILOT’s Szymanek.

The search processes often begin with search consultants focusing on the organizations themselves to get a better idea about their goals and missions and what they are looking to achieve from an outsourced CIO relationship.

“It is similar to a marriage. We are trying to really understand the board, its investment philosophy, and their specific goals and needs,” Donahoe said. “We engage the members direct­ly and work with them to verbalize and document what their ideal outcome would be.”

Scheinberg said North Pier carries a similar approach, saying, “We spend a lot of time at the initial stages, not just getting to know the organization’s needs, but we literally sit down and do interviews with every single committee member.”

Clearview takes a varied approach in the early stages of the process, instead focusing on the institution’s investment policy statement and ad­dressing issues such as asset allocation, benchmarking, governance roles and responsibilities.

“One of the primary objectives of the investment policy statement is to clearly and specifically define and communicate responsibility, authority and accountability,” Coats said.

From there the search consultant or institution will typically issue an RFP to potential candidates directly or to the broad market before beginning the difficult process of evaluating and consolidating responses.

North Pier aims to highlight the differences between the firms to the committee in order to drill down to a shorter list of finalists to present.

“We don’t just hold a dog and pony show. We set the agenda and a recommended amount of time to address the different categories,” Scheinberg said, noting that he and Senior Consultant, Greg Metzger, moderate the sessions and are active in asking questions of the presenters.

Manager Analysis aims to filter through the universe before issuing the RFP to help with alignment, according to Donahoe.

Following the RFP distribution, review and evaluation of proposals, the firm aims to narrow the list of proposals to around five finalists, as they have shown they “can do what is required, will align with the board’s goals, approach and personality, and are not conflicted in any manner,” Donahoe said.

He noted that the firm will go through each potential provider with the board or committee to help them understand what each firm offers and what it is likely to excel at.

“Our manager analysis background brings an unusual set of talent to the due diligence of these outsourced CIO firms,” said Cutler, of Manager Analysis. “I have a strong capital markets background and reviewed over 2,000 alternative investment managers, and the reason that is important is I can come into the meetings and understand whether the outsourced CIO presentations are truthful and credible or not. The integrity of some of these marketing pitches really matches the integrity of derivatives marketing in the early 1990s. You really need to go through and conduct solid due diligence to understand the capabilities, strengths, and weakness of these firms.”

Clearview looks at the candidate pool in four groupings: the incumbent, other firms the organization has a business relationship with, providers recommended by board members based on experience at other organi­zations and, lastly, a list of organizations that submit data to Clearview on behalf of other member organizations. The firm then aggregates responses using the lnHub eRFP portal and prepares a series of reports for committee members to review and score respondents on, according to Coats, who noted that the data is then used to facilitate a conversation and coordinate which firms to bring in for finalist presentations.

Following finalist presentations, the institution is tasked with ultimately making the final selection and entering into the hiring and contract nego­tiation process.

”The ideal outcome is that five or more years in the future, when we have achieved a successful search, the committee is still with the same out­sourced CIO provider,” Donahoe said. ” … Not just because they’ve gotten good performance, hopefully top quartile, but because their goals and philosophies remain aligned.”

He noted that institutions have increasingly looked to the search consultants to help with formalized reviews of the outsourced CIOs every five years or so.

Those periodic reviews can result in foundations and endowments conducting replacement searches, evidenced by 57% of organizations initiating or planning to conduct a replacement search since hiring their outsourced CIO provider, according to the Cerulli report. Of the organiza­tions that have completed the search, exactly half replaced their original discretionary manager, according to the report.

While a majority of North Pier’s clients are looking at the outsourced CIO space for the first time, the firm has begun to see an uptick in organiza­tions conducting replacement searches, as they have a better understand­ing of the services being provided and their respective needs, particularly when it comes to macro level issues, according to Metzger.

In looking at the outsourced CIO market, Scheinberg said North Pier would not hire roughly 80% of the firms claiming to be an outsourced CIO, and that the remaining 20% can be broken out into various buckets based on liquidity appetites, size, style, and ancillary services offered. The firm’s research has found that many of the outsourced CIO offerings coming from firms with traditional general consulting backgrounds, will lag outsourced CIO offering tactical investment strategy by about 120 basis points, ac­cording to Scheinberg.

”The research we have done in these different models has a very different return stream,” Metzger said.

With the outsourced CIO and search provider market flourishing, the cost of the searches comes into question, as everything has a price. Luckily for institutions, the cost to hire a search provider is not as daunting as it may seem.

The typical range for an outsourced CIO search consultant can range between $30,000 and $75,000, with the pricing varying by organization, as well as add-on expenses that arise during the process, according to Scheinberg, who noted that institutions need to ask the right questions and “try and nail down what your expenses are going to be.” He also cautioned about selecting the wrong outsourced CIO as it could cost an institution millions of dollars.

“The fee from outsourced CIO search firms will pretty much pay for itself,” Cutler said. “Fees for the search and selection of an outsourced CIO are not astronomical in any way. If you think of them on an amortized cost basis over the life by which you are going to keep an OCIO, you are talking about a couple of basis points. We may have a dollar price that may look like a lot, but it’s not really that much. If you think about how many outsourced CIO managers we have met, spoken with, and reviewed, you are talking about a huge amount of info you are already gaining access to.”

Dominican University’s Titzer said the search consultant contract price sealed the deal for his decision to hire Plan PILOT to help them rebid the outsourced CIO services.

“There are tight budgets all around here and we don’t have the luxury to spend more on third party firms with­out meaningful results … Even with us not making a change at all, it helped us align the portfolio and reduce costs. The way I look at it, you wouldn’t begrudge a copay at the doctor’s office for a checkup, just like we didn’t begrudge the fees to review our outsourced CIO,” he said.

Disciplina’s Wright notes that while the cost for institutions to hire a search provider are not “prohibitive,” it is another expense that they need to get accustomed to.

“To navigate the landscape, I think institutions need to see what is lost in the cost analysis,” he said. “In that analysis, the cost, whether it is real or mental, is the opportunity cost that is lost in the risk adjusted returns, which can be a large portion of an organization’s operations and pro­grams. Search firms should also aid with fee transparency or true cost. I think that once institutions overcome [that], there will be more growth for OCIO search firms.”

Search Consultant Concerns And Areas For Improvement

As asset management and investment consulting firms have recognized outsourced CIO searches as another potential revenue stream, the firms have added project-based capability to their businesses, which can lead to concerns of conflicts of interest. Those concerns surrounding search consultants are similar to the concerns of conflicts of interest among the outsourced CIO firms they help identify and evaluate.

“I think the space is pretty fair and most search consultants are indepen­dent,” Wright said. “For firms that are wedded to an asset management firm or consultant, the lines can be blurry. I know they say, ‘We have a Chinese wall and no information goes to the other side of the business,’ but the more independence and autonomy of firms, the better it is for the industry. We avoid conflicts in our own business by focusing on one line of business, and prefer search consultants that do the same.”

Most investors noted that conflicts of interest among the search providers have not been an issue to date and continue to emphasize that these firms avoid any gray areas.

“There is still the potential for conflicts of interest where search providers also offer consulting or OCIO-esque services, but by and large our experi­ence has been positive in that the search consultants run fair, unbiased and independent processes,” SEl’s Wilkinson said.

He noted that the search provider space has also helped outsourced CIOs mitigate potential conflicts within their services or implementation, by saying they “have helped clean up that muddiness.”

“If you are a firm that has been reluctant or historically has avoided transparency, chances are now the search consultants will find out. They are asking additional and thorough questions, they are streamlining the process and helping to compare plans the same way, especially when it comes to fees,” he said.

While search providers have helped clean up transparency, there are other facets of the space that they have identified as needing to be less opaque.

“A real limitation we have seen in the outsourced CIO search space, and re­ally across the industry, involves comparability of performance data,” Cutler said. “There are no SEC compliance performance standards, so we rely less on reported historical performance than we would for other types of man­agers. We find many endowment and foundation industry benchmarks may be overstated, so we try to overcome that with our superior analysis of the qualitative aspects of the firms, and getting to know the personnel, how talented they are and how they manage the people and the other aspects of the processes.”

The sentiment was echoed by North Pier’s Scheinberg, who said that the ability to accurately evaluate outsourced CIO performance has been a major problem.

“Left to their own devices, the OCIO won’t show data at a macro level,” he said. “We have to create this data on our own. The industry has the tiger by the tail with this. There is a lot of shenanigans.”

Taking steps to alleviate the issues, North Pier brought 15 of the top outsourced CIO firms together to discuss some data reporting standards during a one-day working group in December, 2018.

“We just think it’s time,” Scheinberg said. “There should be a standard. Organizations 10 years from now should have as easy a time identifying performance on an OCIO firm as they do picking a large-cap growth firm out of Morningstar.”

Outsourced CIOs that have looked to be ahead of the curve, and open about transparency and performance, include Strategic Investment Group, which claimed compliance with Global Investment Performance Standards (GIPS) in 2017. The firm’s decision to become independently GIPS-verified stemmed from the growing demand for clear, quantifiable track records, and to serve as a call to action to its peers to make accurate, appropriate information more accessible to institutions as they review search candi­dates.

Looking to add more transparency into the space, Clearview launched its Study of Investment Fees for Foundations, Endowments and Nonprofits earlier this year. The study, the results of which are expected to be released soon, was conducted to develop a baseline understanding and analysis of the current structure and levels of investment fees incurred by nonprofits, with investment portfolios with assets less than $500 million, and identify the primary variables that impact the investment fees incurred.

Another area where search consultants can aid their nonprofit clients comes during the transition from one outsourced CIO to the next.

“Transition management is an incred­ibly important part of the outsourced CIO process, because once a firm is fired and another is hired, there is a serious gap,” Cutler said. “Foundations and endowments might do a good job finding the right outsourced CIO man­ager, but end up with a bad transition management experience. It’s always someone else’s fault when something goes wrong with a transition.”

Cutler noted instances of assets liquidated during a transition sitting in cash, before being invested slowly over a period of time, which can result in “slippage,” and an institution not being in compliance with their asset allocation goals, as well as losing out on an opportunity to increase assets to use toward its mission.

“That slippage could be 30 basis points on your entire portfolio, or it could be conceivably as much as 70 or 80 basis points when things are really not going well,” Donahoe said. “That is many multiples of the cost of doing a search itself.”

As search consultants have made improvements on the quantitative side of their approach and processes, outsourced CIOs see room for improve­ment on the qualitative aspects of the search processes, according to investors.

Wilkinson has found that the search consultant-led processes have become more formal and structured, in that the lines of communication are very rigid during the process. In his experiences, the outsourced CIO provider, investment committee, and staff do not interact until very late in the search process, with it often concentrated into a two-hour finalist presentation.

“At the end of the day, this is a service industry and service industries are relationship driven … You have to get a feel for a firm to partner with over the next three, five, seven years, so a two-hour meeting is probably not the appropriate amount of time. Moving forward, search consultants can probably improve the process by finding touch points along the way for the OCIOs and the organization to build relationships, which may help the process and the end decision ultimately,” he said.

Another area that search consultants could improve on is easing rigidity in their qualifications and thresholds for the discretionary managers.

Wright noted that when he started Disciplina after managing Emory University and Vanderbilt University’s endowments, outsourced CIOs said the biggest constraint on business will not be size or assets under management, but the number of clients.

“I think that search consultants should factor that into their processes more. The larger outsourced CIOs in terms of assets, number of clients, are very different from the boutique and niche shops like us,” he said. “The larger size, capacity and scale can lead to diminished returns because the service model and returns may get diluted with size.”

Ultimately, the shortcomings of search consultants are outweighed by the benefits they provide to understaffed, resource-constrained nonprofits, as they are “satisfying a real need in the marketplace” and compensating for the “deficiencies in the governance budget” through their formulation of goals and philosophies, RFP construction, distribution and evaluation, according to Donahoe.

“It is pretty clear that search consultants are here to stay,” SEl’s Wilkinson said. “They bring tremendous value to institutions and they are also forcing provider transparency, which we fully support … They are asking additional and thorough questions, they are streamlining the process and helping to compare plans the same way, especially when it comes to fees.”

Disclaimer: Information provided by SEI Investments Management Corpo­ration, a registered investment advisor and wholly owned subsidiary of SEI Investments Company. There are risks involved with investing, including loss of principal. Diversification may not protect against market risk.

Don’t Be Shy! Non-Investment Services an OCIO Can Offer You.

Governance Policies

  1. Periodic, formalized review of Investment Policy Statement (including ESG Investing)
  2. Addressing governance issues and increase efficiency of your Board or Committee
  3. Guidance as to evolving worlds of ESG and Impact Investing
  4. Recommendations as how to overcome any Board dysfunction
  5. Be a neutral “sounding board” for doing things differently or changing processes

Reporting

  1. Providing ad-hoc investment reporting
  2. If some investments are held elsewhere (not with the OCIO, e.g. legacy assets), OCIO may be able/willing to include those positions with OCIO-managed assets and present holistic portfolio summary
  3. Accommodate your special file format needs, e.g. CSV or uploads to secure website
  4. Access to OCIO’s risk portal if it is offered to clients

Accounting/Audit

  1. Provide guidance on special treatment needed for bespoke assets or alternatives held
  2. Help with Audit/IRS requests re: valuation or investment reporting
  3. Assistance if there are concerns about K-1 information/accuracy

Peer Networking

  1. Provide a sense of how peers approach a common issue or provide actual introductions
  2. Obtain information as to salary scales, job duties, size of specific departments, etc.
  3. Invitations to annual/OCIO investor events or industry seminars that may be of interest
  4. Provide research/book/website recommendations

Fund Raising

  1. Introduction to like-minded charities or orgs willing to make grants to the same causes
  2. Meet your donors to assure them that the corpus monies are being prudently invested
  3. Provide future projections of returns and budgets to provide support for a capital campaign

Evaluating/Selling Exotic Gifts Received

  1. Real estate gifts provide a challenge/interim liability between obtaining title and closing a sale
  2. More exotic asset classes such as cryptocurrency create special challenges to liquidate
  3. Art and Sculpture may require special insurance while an exit strategy is planned/effected

Hiring/Vendors

  1. If you wish to get recommendations for an open staff position at your organization
  2. Vendor recommendations (Outside Counsel, IT Security, Grant software, etc.)

The range of ancillary services varies widely across OCIO managers. The ManagerAnalysis.com
team can help you achieve the best match from available OCIO providers to achieve your
specific needs.

Want to learn more?

Please contact Chris Cutler, Tom Donahoe, or Safia Mehta, at 917 287 9551 or 973 452 3992.

©2019 MAS, LLC